Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 01:36

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Horoscope for Saturday, June 07, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Skyrim fans baffled after finding huge gold hoard we’ve never seen before - GAMINGbible
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Owen Wilson Brings Clever, Funny “Stick” in Under Par - Roger Ebert
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Dollar surge could be short-lived after U.S. strike on Iran - CNBC
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Simulations Show What Really Happens When a Black Hole Devours a Neutron Star - Gizmodo